{"id":343,"date":"2016-02-19T15:21:02","date_gmt":"2016-02-19T06:21:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/?page_id=343"},"modified":"2016-02-19T15:21:02","modified_gmt":"2016-02-19T06:21:02","slug":"ws2016","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/isai2016\/ws2016","title":{"rendered":"\u2014 workshop2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;!&#8211;<br \/>\nAccepted workshops will be available in April 2016.<br \/>\nAccepted workshops in 2014 is available (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/isai2014\/ws2014\">Accepted workshops in 2014<\/a>).<br \/>\n&#8211;&gt;<\/p>\n<p>List of workshops <\/p>\n<ol>\n<li> <a href=\"#JURISIN\">Tenth International Workshop on Juris-informatics<\/a> (JURISIN 2016)<\/li>\n<li> <a href=\"#HAT-MASH\">The 2nd international workshop Healthy Aging Tech Mashup service, data and people<\/a> (HAT-MASH 2016)<\/li>\n<li> <a href=\"#SKL\">Skill Sciences<\/a> <\/li>\n<li> <a href=\"#SCIDOCA\">Scientific Document Analysis<\/a> (SCIDOCA 2016)<\/li>\n<li> <a href=\"#LENLS\">Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics 13<\/a> (LENLS 13)<\/li>\n<li> <a href=\"#AI=Biz\">Artificial Intelligence of and for Business <\/a> (AI-Biz 2016)<\/li>\n<li> <a href=\"#ELS-JSAI\">The Ethical, Legal and Social Issues of Robots in Therapy and Education<\/a> (ELS-JSAI)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li>Workshop Program<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<table border=\"1\" rules=\"none\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th><\/th>\n<th>Nov.14<\/th>\n<th>Nov.15<\/th>\n<th>Nov.16<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Gallery space<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#plenary\">Plenary talk<\/a><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Symposium space<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/www.is.ocha.ac.jp\/~bekki\/lenls\/\">LENLS<\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/www.is.ocha.ac.jp\/~bekki\/lenls\/\">LENLS<\/a><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Meeting room(large-1)<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/sites.google.com\/site\/hatmash2016\/home\">HAT-MASH<\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/sites.google.com\/site\/hatmash2016\/home\">HAT-MASH<\/a><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Meeting room(large-2)<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/sig-bi.jp\/ai-biz2016.html\">AI-Biz<\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/research.nii.ac.jp\/~ksatoh\/scidoca2016\/\">SCIDOCA<\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/research.nii.ac.jp\/~ksatoh\/scidoca2016\/\">SCIDOCA<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Meeting room(middle)<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kl.i.is.nagoya-u.ac.jp\/jurisin2016\/\">JURISIN<\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kl.i.is.nagoya-u.ac.jp\/jurisin2016\/\">JURISIN<\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jaist.ac.jp\/ks\/skl\/activity\/pg118.html\">Skill Sciences<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Meeting room(small)<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/legalaspectsofsocialrobots.wordpress.com\/\">ELS<\/a><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The seventh JSAI International Symposia on AI (JSAI-isAI 2016) will take place at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hc.keio.ac.jp\/en\/about\/index.html\">Raiosha<\/a> in \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.keio.ac.jp\/en\/maps\/hiyoshi.html\">Hiyoshi Campus<\/a>\u00a0of Keio University, Yokohama, Kanazawa.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<ul>\n<li id=\"plenary\">Plenary talk 13:00-14:00, Nov.14 (Gallery space)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Speakers: Prof. Fernando Koch<br \/>\nACM Distinguished Speaker<br \/>\nInvited Professor at Korea University, Graduate School of Management of Technology<br \/>\nHonorary Senior Fellow, The University of Melbourne<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fernandokoch.me\/\">http:\/\/www.fernandokoch.me\/<img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-449 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/Koch-1.png\" alt=\"koch\" width=\"182\" height=\"193\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Title:\u00a0Disruptive Technologies and the Future of Society<\/p>\n<p>Topics: Artificial Language\/Machine Learning,Computers and Society,Emerging Technologies,Science &amp; Computing<\/p>\n<p>Abstract:<br \/>\nThe new generation of technology development &#8212; including Computational intelligence, Cognitive Computing, Internet of Things, Social Computing and Virtual Reality, and others \u2013 will disrupt the economic and social model of every human endeavor. Advances in these domains are inevitable, irreversible, and their impact is immeasurable. The questions are: how to promote strategies to embrace, commercialize, and monetize these new technologies? How to prepare business and society to this new technology revolution? And, how to position current business to be part of this evolution reaping the benefits of disruptive technologies?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li id=\"JURISIN\">Workshop 1 : Tenth International Workshop on Juris-informatics (JURISIN 2016)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Juris-informatics is a new research area which studies legal issues from the perspective of informatics. The purpose of this workshop is to discuss both the fundamental and practical issues among people from the various backgrounds such as law, social science, information and intelligent technology, logic and philosophy, including the conventional &#8220;AI and law&#8221; area. We solicit unpublished papers on theories, technologies and applications on juris-informatics.<\/p>\n<p>Organizers:<br \/>\nWorkshop Chair:<br \/>\nMakoto Nakamura, Nagoya University<br \/>\nSeiichiro Sakurai, Meiji Gakuin University<br \/>\nKatsuhiko Toyama, Nagoya University<\/p>\n<p>Steering Committee:<br \/>\nTakehiko Kasahara, Toin Yokohama University<br \/>\nMakoto Nakamura, Nagoya University<br \/>\nKatsumi Nitta, Tokyo Institute of Technology<br \/>\nSeiichiro Sakurai, Meiji Gakuin University<br \/>\nKen Satoh, National Institute of Informatics and Sokendai<br \/>\nSatoshi Tojo, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology(JAIST)<br \/>\nKatsuhiko Toyama, Nagoya University<\/p>\n<p>Website:<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.kl.i.is.nagoya-u.ac.jp\/jurisin2016\/\">http:\/\/www.kl.i.is.nagoya-u.ac.jp\/jurisin2016\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Report:<br \/>\nThe Tenth International Workshop on Juris-Informatics (JURISIN 2016) was held with a support of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence (JSAI) in association with JSAI International Symposia on AI (JSAI-isAI 2016). Although JURISIN has been organized to discuss legal issues from the perspective of informatics, the scope of JURISIN is more wide-ranging than that of the conventional AI and law. Thus, the members of Program Committee (PC) are leading researchers in various fields. The collaborative work of computer scientists, lawyers and philosophers is expected to contribute to the advancement of juris-informatics and it is also expected to open novel research areas.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the short announcement period, eighteen papers were submitted. Each paper was reviewed by three or more members of PC. This year, we allowed a double submission to JURIX 2016. As a result, one paper was withdrawn because of acceptance to JURIX 2016 and fifteen papers were accepted in total. The collection of papers covers various topics such as legal reasoning, argumentation theory, legal compliance, dispute resolution, application of AI and informatics to law, application of natural language processing and so on. As invited speakers, we had Professor Doctor Georg Borges from Saarland University, Germany and Professor Harumichi Yuasa from Institute of Information Security, Japan. Moreover, we had a plenary talk by Professor Fernando Koch, ACM Distinguished Speaker, Invited Professor at Korea University, and Honorary Senior Fellow at the University of Melbourne. We had a total of 37 participants, who engaged in a lively discussion.<\/p>\n<p>Following the previous years, JURISIN had a session on the third Competition on Legal Information Extraction\/Entailment (COLIEE 2016) which consisted of a result report of the competition and eight papers for each participant.<\/p>\n<p>The list of presentations is as follows:<br \/>\n1. (Invited Talk) Electronic Person &#8211; rights for robot: Georg Borges (Saarland University, Germany)<br \/>\n2. A Formal Analysis of Legal Reasoning: Yasuo Nakayama<br \/>\n3. A Framework to Reason about the Legal Compliance of Security Standards: Cesare Bartolini, Andra Giurgiu, Lenzini Gabriele and Livio Robaldo<br \/>\n4. (Plenary Talk) Artificial Language\/Machine Learning,Computers and Society,Emerging Technologies,Science &amp; Computing: Fernando Koch (Korea University, Korea; The University of Melbourne, Australia)<br \/>\n5. A Method to Estimate Document Structure from Unstructured Documents: Yoichi Hatsutori, Katsumasa Yoshikawa and Haruki Imai<br \/>\n6. Voluntary Manslaughter? Intention-to-Kill in Meta-Argumentation with Supports: Ryuta Arisaka and Ken Satoh<br \/>\n7. Modeling Attempt Crime in Criminal Law: Jiraporn Pooksook, Phan Minh Dung and Ken Satoh<br \/>\n8. Argument-based Logic Programming for Analogical Reasoning: Teeradaj Racharak, Satoshi Tojo, Nguyen Duy Hung and Prachya Boonkwan<br \/>\n9. Dischargeable Obligations in ALP: A case study from the Japanese Civil Code: Marco Alberti, Marco Gavanelli, Evelina Lamma, Fabrizio Riguzzi and Riccardo Zese<br \/>\n10. (Invited Talk) Technological Development and Japanese Law regarding Artificial Intelligence: Harumichi Yuasa (Institute of Information Security, Japan)<br \/>\n11. (COLIEE Session) COLIEE-2016: Evaluation of the Competition on Legal Information Extraction and Entailment: Mi-Young Kim, Randy Goebel, Yoshinobu Kano and Ken Satoh<br \/>\n12. An Approach to Information Retrieval and Question Answering in the Legal Domain: Kolawole John Adebayo, Luigi Di Caro, Guido Boella and Cesare Bartolini<br \/>\n13. Legal Question Answering Using Paraphrasing and Entailment Analysis: Mi-Young Kim, Ying Xu, Yao Lu and Randy Goebel<br \/>\n14. Legal Question Answering using Ranking SVM and Deep Convolutional Neural Network: Phong-Khac Do, Huy-Tien Nguyen, Chien-Xuan Tran, Minh-Tien Nguyen and Nguyen Le Minh<br \/>\n15. Legal Yes\/No Question Answering System using Case-Role Analysis: Ryosuke Taniguchi and Yoshinobu Kano<br \/>\n16. An Ensemble Based Legal Information Retrieval and Entailment System: Kiyoun Kim, Seongwan Heo, Sungchul Jung, Kihyun Hong and Young-Yik Rhim<br \/>\n17. Legal Information Extraction\/Entailment Using SVM-Ranking and Tree-based Convolutional Neural Network: Truong-Son Nguyen, Viet-Anh Phan, Thanh-Huy Nguyen, Hai-Long Trieu, Ngoc-Phuong Chau, Trung-Tin Pham and Nguyen Le Minh<br \/>\n18. Lexical to Discourse-level Corpus Modeling for Legal Question Answering: Danilo Carvalho, Vu Tran, Khanh Tran, Viet Lai and Nguyen Le Minh<br \/>\n19. Civil Code Article Information Retrieval System based on Legal Terminology and Civil Code Article Structure: Daiki Onodera and Masaharu Yoshioka<\/p>\n<p>The next COLIEE will be held as an international workshop in conjunction with ICAIL (International Conference on AI and Law) in 2017. Through the activity of the workshop, we will attempt to expand a network of juris-informatics.<\/p>\n<p>JURISIN2016 Chairs<br \/>\nMakoto Nakamura, Nagoya University<br \/>\nSeiichiro Sakurai, Meiji Gakuin University<br \/>\nKatsuhiko Toyama, Nagoya University<\/p>\n<p>Photos:<br \/>\n1. Invited Talk by Prof. Borges<br \/>\n2. Invited Talk by Prof. Yuasa<br \/>\n3. Banquet<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li id=\"HAT-MASH\">Workshop 2 : The 2nd international workshop Healthy Aging Tech Mashup service, data and people (HAT-MASH 2016)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Ageing of the population cause not only substantial increase of GDP spent on elderly care per year but also societal effects, which impacts not just the health sector. Meanwhile to develop a sustainable social system, the global society envisions a transformation from reactive care to proactive care and to continuous monitoring of wellbeing and maintenance. To support this trend, we need transdisciplinary approaches and take into account demographic change, changes in the global economy and the development of new technologies.<\/p>\n<p>The main objective of this workshop is to provide a forum to discuss important research questions and practical challenges in healthy aging and elderly care support to promote transdisciplinary approaches. The workshop welcomes researchers, academicians as well as industrial professionals of different but relevant fields from all over the world to present their research results and development activities. The workshop provides opportunities for the participants to exchange new ideas and experiences face to face, to establish research or business network and to find global partners for future collaboration.<\/p>\n<p>This is the 2nd HAT-MASH following HAT-MASH2015 which was successfully held on the 16th and 17th of November, 2015 as part of JSAI-isAI 2015, supported by the Society for Serviceology and JST.<\/p>\n<p>Organizers:<br \/>\nKen Fukuda, AIRC, AIST<br \/>\nTakuichi Nishimura, AIRC, AIST<\/p>\n<p>Program committee members (tetative):<br \/>\nKentaro Watanabe, AIST<br \/>\nHiroyasu Miwa, AIST<br \/>\nSatoshi Nishimura, AIST<\/p>\n<p>Website:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/sites.google.com\/site\/hatmash2016\/home\">https:\/\/sites.google.com\/site\/hatmash2016\/home<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Report:<br \/>\nHAT-MASH 2016 (Healthy Aging Tech mashup service, data and people) was held successfully on the 14th and 15th of November, 2016 as part of the JSAI-isAI workshop series. It was the second international workshop that bridges healthy aging and elderly care technology, information technology and service engineering.<br \/>\nWe had three keynote lectures, 12 presentations including 3 from elderly facilities. 23 attendees were from academia, private sectors.<\/p>\n<p>We would like to thank again to Prof. Mihoko Ohtake (Chiba University, Japan) for her presentation titled &#8220;Detection of Cognitive Impairment and Enhancement Technology Utilizing Conversation Data of Older Adults&#8221; and Prof. Pertti Saariluoma (University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4, Finland) for his presentation titled &#8220;Designing for Life&#8221; and Dr. Jaana Leikas (VTT, Finland) for her presentation titled &#8220;Ageing and Technology: Design Goals and Ethical Discussion&#8221;.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li id=\"SKL\">Workshop 3 : Skill Sciences<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Human skills involve well-attuned perception and fine motor control, often accompanied by thoughtful planning. The involvement of body, environment, and tools mediating them makes the study of skills unique among researches of human intelligence. The symposium invites researchers who investigate human skills and provides them with a place for exchange and discussion. The study of skills requires various disciplines to collaborate with each other because the value of skills is not determined solely in terms of efficiency, but calls for consideration of quality. Quality resides in person and often needs to be transferred through apprentice systems. The procedure of validation is strict, but more complex than scientific activities, where everything needs to be<br \/>\ndescribed by referring to data. We are keen to discussing the theoretical foundations of skill science as well as practical and engineering issues in the study.<\/p>\n<p>Organizers:<br \/>\nTsutomu Fujinami, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology<\/p>\n<p>Program committee (tetative):<br \/>\nMasaki Suwa, Keio University<br \/>\nKen Hashizume, Osaka University<br \/>\nMihoko Otake, Chiba University<br \/>\nYoshifusa Matsuura, Yokohama National University<br \/>\nKeisuke Okuno, Riken<br \/>\nMizue Kayama, Shinshu University<\/p>\n<p>Website:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.jaist.ac.jp\/ks\/skl\/activity\/pg118.html\">http:\/\/www.jaist.ac.jp\/ks\/skl\/activity\/pg118.html<\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<p>Report:<br \/>\nThe Third International Workshop on Skill Science was held on<br \/>\n16th November 2016, where five lectures and eight interactive<br \/>\npresentations were given. We invited Prof. Randy<br \/>\nGoebel (Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta)<br \/>\nto give us a keynote lecture. About thirty people took part in<br \/>\nthe workshop.<\/p>\n<p>The special interest group of Skill Science has been active for<br \/>\nmore than ten years. The first international meeting was<br \/>\norganized in 2007 and the second one was organized last year<br \/>\nafter almost ten years&#8217; break. This year&#8217;s meeting is the third<br \/>\none without break. We aimed to internationalize the research on<br \/>\nskills through organizing the meeting and I believe that we have<br \/>\nachieved our goal as we saw more people who speak English than<br \/>\nlast year.<\/p>\n<p>The topics covered in the meeting hint well how rich our targets<br \/>\nof research can be. We talked about sports, conversation, tea<br \/>\nceremony, etc. We also touched topics closely related to our life<br \/>\nsuch as care-giving or immovable property. The interactive<br \/>\npresentations functioned as a place to invite students who speak<br \/>\nEnglish better than Japanese, which is important given the trend<br \/>\nthat we receive more students from overseas than before. The<br \/>\nmeeting seems overall to have attracted younger generations,<br \/>\nwhich is favorable in changing generations comprising the group.<\/p>\n<p>Prof. Randy Goebel stimulated us with insights obtained from his<br \/>\nspecialty, machine learning, referring to works by one of his<br \/>\ncolleagues, Patrick Pilarski. Our effort to increase the number<br \/>\nof articles written in English might have enabled other<br \/>\nresearchers in neighboring domains to investigate the target from<br \/>\ndifferent perspectives than ours.<\/p>\n<p>We are grateful to people who managed the international symposia<br \/>\nas we could organize our meeting easily despite the fact that we<br \/>\nhad a long break since the first international meeting held in<br \/>\nyear of 2007. We are organizing the fourth meeting in 2017,<br \/>\ntoo. We hope that our meeting will evolve to a place where<br \/>\neveryone can present and discuss topics related to Skill Science<br \/>\nwithout being bothered by the language barrier.<\/p>\n<li id=\"SCIDOCA\">Workshop 4 : Scientific Document Analysis (SCIDOCA 2016)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Recent proliferation of scientific papers and technical documents has become an obstacle to efficient information acquisition of new information in various fields. It is almost impossible for individual researchers to check and read all related documents. Even retrieving relevant documents is becoming harder and harder. This workshop gathers all the researchers and experts who are aiming at scientific document analysis from various perspectives, and invite technical paper presentations and system demonstrations that cover any aspects including but not limited to: Text analysis, document structure analysis, figure and table analysis, and citation analysis of scientific and technical documents, scientific information assimilation, summarization and visualization, knowledge discovery\/mining from scientific papers and data, and document understanding in general.<\/p>\n<p>Organizers:<br \/>\nWorkshop Chair:<br \/>\nYuji Matsumoto, Nara Institute of Science and Technology<br \/>\nCo-chair:<br \/>\nHiroshi Noji, Nara Institute of Science and Technology<\/p>\n<p>Program committee (tetative):<br \/>\nYuji Matsumoto, NAIST<br \/>\nHiroshi Noji, NAIST<br \/>\nHiroyuki Shindo, NAIST<br \/>\nKen Sato, NII<br \/>\nCentro Inui, Tohoku University<br \/>\nNagoya Inoue, Tohoku University<br \/>\nAkin Aizawa, NII<br \/>\nYusuke Miyao, NII<br \/>\nTakeshi Abekawa, NII<br \/>\nHidetsugu Nanba, Hiroshima City University<br \/>\nYoshimasa Tsuruoka, University of Tokyo<br \/>\nJunichiro Mori, University of Tokyo<br \/>\nYoshinobu Kano, Shizuoka University<\/p>\n<p>Website:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/research.nii.ac.jp\/~ksatoh\/scidoca2016\/\">http:\/\/research.nii.ac.jp\/~ksatoh\/scidoca2016\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Report:<br \/>\n\u3000We held SCIDOCA 2016 (First International Workshop on SCIentific DOCument Analysis) in JSAI-isAI. In several research areas such as biology and material science, the number of published papers per day is rapidly increasing and there is a growing demand for analyzing the structure of papers automatically. To discuss the research progress on this area, we called for papers on natural language processing and information retrieval focusing on scientific documents.<br \/>\n This year we were delayed to announce the CFP; to collect papers, we decided to call for short paper track, which accepts papers up to 4 pages (up to 6 pages at final submission), in addition to the ordinary long paper track. After reviewing, we were able to accept one long paper, and 13 short papers.<br \/>\n The workshop was in two days, 15-16 November. We were grateful to have a distinguished invited speaker for each day, two in total. The first speaker was Jin-Dong Kim at Database Center for Life Science (DBCLS) and he presented recent advances in annotation on scientific literatures. The second speaker was Randy Goebel at University of Alberta, and talked about challenges on information extraction from big data.<br \/>\n This workshop was related to our research project of JST CREST on scientific document analysis launched in the last year, and our aim was to facilitate communication between relevant researchers. Though unfortunately this year we didn\u2019t have much time for CFP and we couldn\u2019t gather many oversea researchers, we would like to extend the workshop in future based on this experience to make this works a great community for relevant researchers.<\/p>\n<p>Hiroshi Noji and Yuji Matsumoto<br \/>\nSCIDOCA 2016 Program Committee C-Chairs<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li id=\"LENLS\">Workshop 5 : Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics 13 (LENLS 13)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>LENLS is an annual international workshop on formal syntax, semantics and pragmatics. We invite submissions on topics in formal syntax, model-theoretic and\/or proof-theoretic semantics, computational semantics, game-theoretic\/bayesian approaches to pragmatics, non-classical logic and its relation to natural language, and formal philosophy of language.<\/p>\n<p>Organizers:<br \/>\nDaisuke Bekki, Ochanomizu University\/National Institute of Informatics<br \/>\nKoji Mineshima, Ochanomizu University<\/p>\n<p>Program committee (tetative):<br \/>\nAlastair Butler<br \/>\nDaisuke Bekki<br \/>\nEric McCready<br \/>\nKoji Mineshima<br \/>\nYoshiki Mori<br \/>\nYasuo Nakayama<br \/>\nKatsuhiko Sano<br \/>\nKatsuhiko Yabushita<br \/>\nTomoyuki Yamada<br \/>\nShunsuke Yatabe<br \/>\nKei Yoshimoto<\/p>\n<p>Website:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.is.ocha.ac.jp\/~bekki\/lenls\/\">http:\/\/www.is.ocha.ac.jp\/~bekki\/lenls\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Report:<br \/>\nOn November 13-15, 2016, the Thirteenth International Workshop of Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics (LENLS 13) took place. As an annual international workshop recognised internationally in the formal syntax-semantics-pragmatics community, LENLS has, since 2005, been bringing together for discussion and interdisciplinary communication researchers working on formal theories of natural language syntax, semantics and pragmatics, (formal) philosophy, artificial intelligence and computational linguistics.<\/p>\n<p>On November 13th the workshop was located at the National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics, Tachikawa, and on subsequent days moved to the Raiousha Building, Keio University, as a workshop of the Eighth JSAI International Symposia on AI (JSAI-isAI 2011), organised by The Japan Society for Artificial Intelligence (JSAI).<\/p>\n<p>The first day of LENLS 13 comprised an \u201cUnshared Task\u201d that asked participants to make use of datasets (FraCaS, MultiFraCaS and JSeM) as benchmarks for measuring and comparing the competence of syntax\/semantic theories and computational  processing systems. Submissions for the remaining days of LENLS came from topics in formal syntax, semantics and pragmatics, and related fields.<\/p>\n<p>The first day had three twenty minute talks, three thirty minute talks, as well as three invited lectures that were each one hour in length. The invited speakers on this day were Robin Cooper (University of Gothenburg), who spoke about testing the FraCaS test suite, Tim O\u2019Gorman (University of Colorado Boulder), who spoke about Abstract Meaning Representation performance on the Fracas test Suite, and Masaaki Nagata (NTT Communication Science Laboratories) who talked about how semantics can contribute to neural machine translation.<\/p>\n<p>The following two days of LENLS 13 had fifteen submitted talks with the duration of thirty minutes each, and two invited lectures that were each one hour in length. Topics discussed by the submitted papers raised issues from Dynamic Semantics, Expressive meanings, Type Theoretic Semantics, language generation, syntactic analysis as well as fundamental themes from the philosophy of language. The invited speakers were  Youichi Matsusaka (Tokyo Metropolitan University), who talked about a Metasemantic study of reference and pattern recognition, and again Robin Cooper (University of Gothenburg), who spoke about proper names in interaction.<\/p>\n<p>For workshop participants a proceedings volume was made available containing 17 papers and 9 abstracts (five of which were for the invited talks). In addition a selection of papers from the workshop are to be published as a portion of a volume &#8220;JSAI-isAI2016 selected papers&#8221;, which will be published in the `Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence&#8217; series (Springer Verlag).<\/p>\n<p>Chair: Alastair Butler (National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics)<\/p>\n<p>Co-chair: Koji Mineshima (Ochanomizu University\/JST CREST), Daisuke Bekki (Ochanomizu University\/JST CREST\/AIST AIRC\/NII), and Eric McCready (Aoyama Gakuin University)<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li id=\"AI=Biz\">Workshop 6 : Artificial Intelligence of and for Business (AI-Biz 2016)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<ul>The objective of this workshop is to foster the concepts and techniques of\u201cBusiness Intelligence (BI).\u201d in Artificial Intelligence. BI should include such cutting-edge techniques as data science, agent-based modelling, complex adaptive systems, and IoT. The application areas include but not limited to business management, finance engineering, service sciences, manufacturing engineering, and so on.<\/ul>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The basic idea of BI would enhance the capabilities of conventional techniques in business domain, however, so far, we have not discussed BI concepts deeply in artificial intelligence literature. We would like to focus on BI topics to the issues of firms and organizations for getting more benefits on interactions with human- and computer- mixed systems.<\/p>\n<p>The main purpose of this workshop is to provide a forum to discuss important research questions and practical challenges in Business Intelligence, Business Informatics, Data Analysis and Agent-based Modelling to exchange latest results, to join efforts in solving the common challenges. It is also to establish an effective communication between researchers and developers involved in the both areas. The workshop will provide opportunities for the participants to exchange new ideas and experiences to establish research or business network and to find global partners for future collaboration.<\/p>\n<p>Organizers:<br \/>\nWorkshop Chair:<br \/>\nTakao Terano, Tokyo Institute of Technology<br \/>\nHiroshi Takahashi, Keio University<br \/>\nSetsuya Kurahashi, University of Tsukuba<\/p>\n<p>Steering Committee Members:<br \/>\nHiroshi Deguchi, Tokyo Institute of Technology<br \/>\nManage Ichikawa, National Institute of Public Health<br \/>\nHajime Kita, Kyoto University<br \/>\nKeiki Takadama, The University of Electro-Communications<br \/>\nShinzo Takahashi, Waseda University<br \/>\nTakashi Yamada, Yamaguchi University<\/p>\n<p>Website:<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/sig-bi.jp\/ai-biz2016.html\">http:\/\/sig-bi.jp\/ai-biz2016.html<\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li id=\"ELS-JSAI\">Workshop 7 : The Ethical, Legal and Social Issues of Robots in Therapy and Education (ELS-JSAI)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Survey Website:<br \/>\nWould you please contribute a survey to ELS-JSAI?<br \/>\nThe survey will take about 15 min to be completed and your answers will be very important for future work on these subjects.<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/bino.qualtrics.com\/jfe\/form\/SV_9n9DUjD9Ex5bpbv\">https:\/\/bino.qualtrics.com\/jfe\/form\/SV_9n9DUjD9Ex5bpbv<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Our aim is to conduct parallel research between Europe and Japan on the ethical, legal and social (ELS) issues concerning the adoption of social robots in the contexts of therapy and education.<\/p>\n<p>The twinned workshop has multiple objectives:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Collect all the ELS concerns, problems and difficulties concerning this type of technology \u2013 focusing on ethics, privacy and liability<\/li>\n<li>Enable discussions on the ELS aspects on an interdisciplinary and multicultural scale<\/li>\n<li>Provide a comprehensive roadmap for solving these issues<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This twinned workshop brings together researchers from different disciplines, backgrounds and cultures to provide interdisciplinary insights into the current legal and ethical discussions about the impact of robots on society. This will serve to gather different scenarios on the topic. It will deepen our understanding of the real concerns and problems that researchers, teachers, therapists, and legal scholars are currently facing. It will also ensure an appropriate balance between innovation and user rights.<\/p>\n<p>Organizers:<br \/>\nEduard Fosch Villaronga, Science and Technology Erasmus Mundus Programme<br \/>\nAurelia Tam\u00f2, University of Zurich<br \/>\nChristoph Lutz, BI Norwegian Business School and the University of Leipzig<\/p>\n<p>Website:<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/legalaspectsofsocialrobots.wordpress.com\/\">https:\/\/legalaspectsofsocialrobots.wordpress.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Report:<br \/>\nSummary<br \/>\nThe Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of Social Robots<br \/>\nin  Healthcare  and  Education  Workshop  (also  called<br \/>\nELS Workshop) was held in Yokohama the 14th Nov<br \/>\n2016 during the JSAI-isAI Conference. The workshop<br \/>\nwas  twinned  with  another  workshop  in  the  New<br \/>\nFriends Conference in Barcelona the 2nd Nov 2016.<br \/>\nThe workshop aimed at addressing the concerns that<br \/>\nthe use of social robots in therapy end education pose<br \/>\nin  the  legal,  ethical  and  societal  (ELS)  domain  in  a<br \/>\nconstructive  and  proactive  manner.  It  took  up<br \/>\nimportant  ELS  challenges  that  come  with  the<br \/>\nintroduction  of  robots  in  therapy  and  education<br \/>\nthrough  very  simple  cases.  A  booklet  available  to<br \/>\nanyone  was  created  in  order  to  ease  the  discussions<br \/>\nand can be found here.<br \/>\nThe  ELS  Workshop  first,  it  dealt  with  aspects  of<br \/>\nhuman dignity and the questions of whether and how<br \/>\nsocial robots could endanger an individual\u2019s dignity, for<br \/>\nexample,  by  implying  an  overly  simplistic  model  of<br \/>\nhuman  agency  or  by  discriminating  against  certain<br \/>\npopulation  groups.  Second,  the  workshop  revolved<br \/>\naround the topic of privacy. Third, the topic of liability<br \/>\nwas addressed.<br \/>\nThe  three  overarching  ELS  issues  \u2013  dignity,  privacy,<br \/>\nand  liability  \u2013  were  discussed  in  an  open  discussion<br \/>\nworkshop  format.  The  workshop  laid  the  focus  on defining the benefits, conflicts, and possible solutions<br \/>\nto  the  conflicts  that  such  new  technologies  pose.<br \/>\nResearchers  from  all  disciplines  as  well  as<br \/>\npractitioners  actively  engaged  in  the  discussions.  In<br \/>\nparticular  those  participants  who  submitted  an<br \/>\nabstract for the workshop. <\/p>\n<p>Main findings<br \/>\nHere  there  are  the  main  findings  of  what  the  ELS<br \/>\nWorkshop discussed about: a) challenges and issues of<br \/>\nsocial robots in therapy and education; b) addressing<br \/>\nthe  challenges  \/  finding  solutions. A  list  of  recurrent<br \/>\ntopics  has  been  also  added  in  c);  as  well  as  a  list  of<br \/>\nfuture  steps  that  the  researchers  that  attended  the<br \/>\nworkshop  compromised  to  carry  out.  The  following<br \/>\ncomments are not attributed to particular individuals<br \/>\nand are clustered by relevant thematic topics. <\/p>\n<p>a)  Challenges  and  issues  of  social  robots  in  therapy<br \/>\nand education <\/p>\n<p>\u2022Public participation: Users are not taken into account<br \/>\ninto the design process of the robot and that is why the<br \/>\n\u201cuser-centered\u201d  is,  at  the  current  stage,  not  a  true<br \/>\nstatement.<br \/>\n\u2022Public awareness: Connected with the user-centered<br \/>\nidea,  citizens  opinion  is  neither  taken  into  account<br \/>\nduring  the  policy-making  process. At  the  same  time,<br \/>\nhowever,  it  seems  that  people  do  not  read  the<br \/>\ngovernment website and are not very engaged with the<br \/>\ngovernment.  Some  participants  mentioned  that  in<br \/>\nKorea individual privacy is not perceived to have much<br \/>\nvalue  and  that  the  Government  does  not  promote<br \/>\npublic awareness concerning it.<br \/>\n\u2022Public  Security:  It  was  explained  in  the  workshop<br \/>\nthat in Korea there are lots of security issues in the<br \/>\ncountry,  and  a  case  concerning  a  data  leak  was<br \/>\nexplained. If robots will be spread in the market, it will<br \/>\nbe crucial to address all the security issues, especially<br \/>\nif elderly and disabled people are involved.<br \/>\n\u2022Privacy  Post-Mortem:  third  uses  of  data  is  a  very<br \/>\nimportant  issue,  especially  when  it  comes  to  privacy<br \/>\npost  mortem.  Should  the  informed  consent  involve<br \/>\nprivacy after the death of the person?<br \/>\n\u2022Legal management: The case of the Henna Hotel was<br \/>\nintroduced as an example of how robotic technology is<br \/>\nalready in the market. While the industry has already<br \/>\ntaken  steps  towards  the  introduction  of  robotic<br \/>\ntechnology  to  the  market,  there  has  been  no  legal<br \/>\naccompaniment, especially in the case of educational<br \/>\nand therapeutic robots.<br \/>\n\u2022Standards: Due to the lack of this legal management,<br \/>\nit is not very clear what standards apply to educational<br \/>\nand therapeutic robots. They simply do not exist in the<br \/>\nindustry.<br \/>\n\u2022Legal uncertainty: Unless there is a problem, it seems<br \/>\nthat the Law is not providing any pro-active measure<br \/>\ntowards  how  to  ensure  a  correct  design\/use  of  robot<br \/>\ntechnology.<br \/>\n\u2022 Immigrant  discrimination:  Japan  is  investing  in<br \/>\nrobotic technology instead of hiring foreigners due to<br \/>\nlanguage  difficulties  as  well  as  cultural  differences.<br \/>\nElderly prefer to be treated by Japanese caregivers or<br \/>\nby robot technology rather than by immigrants.<br \/>\n\u2022 Employment  of  robot  technology:  The  immigrant<br \/>\ndiscriminatory  scenario  is  aggravated  by  the  low<br \/>\nwages Japanese caregivers receive.<br \/>\n\u2022Dehumanizing practice: In Japan, it is normally the<br \/>\ndaughter or the daughter-in-law that takes care of the<br \/>\nmother\/grandmother.  Dehumanizing  the  practice  of<br \/>\ncare could bring more free time to the caregiver (that<br \/>\nis  in  this  case  a  relative)  but  could  bring  about  the<br \/>\ndecrease  of  human-human  interaction  from  the  care<br \/>\nreceiver side.<br \/>\n\u2022 Multiple  Legislations:  There  is  an  urgent  need  to<br \/>\naddress  the  ELS  issues  if  this  robotic  technology  is<br \/>\ngoing  to  be  shipped  all  over  the  world.  Compliance<br \/>\nwith each national legislation will bring about many<br \/>\nconflicts that challenge the insertion of these robots to<br \/>\nthe market.<br \/>\n\u2022 Multiple  Robots:  Each  robot  is  different  and  the<br \/>\ncontext  where  they  are  inserted  too.  Therefore,  it  is<br \/>\ndifficult to standardize case-by-case scenarios.<br \/>\n\u2022 Substitution  of  humans:  Some  of  the  participants<br \/>\nwondered why humans need to surrender to the robot<br \/>\ntaking-over scenario and who is in charge of deciding<br \/>\nthis.  This  brought  about  the  following  issue:<br \/>\ntechnology is not people-driven.<br \/>\n\u2022Robot  obligations:  If  academia  is  talking  about  the<br \/>\npossibility to provide robot rights, this highlights the<br \/>\nimportance of receiving also obligations.<br \/>\n\u2022Unexpected  consequences:  Some  of  the  robots  that<br \/>\nare entering to the market have not been tested in real<br \/>\ncontexts  and  unexpected  consequences  can  easily  be<br \/>\nencountered.<br \/>\n\u2022Agency: connected with the unexpected consequences,<br \/>\nit is not very clear whether the agency comes from the<br \/>\ncontext or if the agency comes from the designers. Who<br \/>\nis entitled to decide the agency of their robot?<br \/>\n\u2022 New  Agency:  The  literature  has  been  comparing robots  to  animals,  corporations  and  other  things\u2026<br \/>\nshould the robot be considered a new agent?<br \/>\n\u2022Religion:  Agency  is  perceived  differently  depending<br \/>\non  the  religion.  Some  comments  on  how  inanimate<br \/>\nthings  have  spirit  were  highlighted,  as  well  as  how<br \/>\nHinduism  also  welcomes  low-agency  objects  to  be<br \/>\nimportant, e.g. a book cannot be touched by the feet.<br \/>\nWhat it is not clear is whether it is a religion problem<br \/>\nor an individual problem.<br \/>\n\u2022Human Behavior: An experiment in Japan found as a<br \/>\nresult  that  children  can  beat  a  robot  in  a  mall.  This<br \/>\nexperiment was explained in the workshop in order to<br \/>\navoid the replica of the behavior in the human-human<br \/>\ninteraction.<br \/>\n\u2022Education: Not a lot of schools have access to robotic<br \/>\ntechnology,  although  it  seems  to  be  important  to<br \/>\neducate  the  population  on  the  correct  use  of  robotic<br \/>\ntechnology.<br \/>\n\u2022New  law:  do  robots  challenge  the  legal  system  in  a<br \/>\ndifferent manner other agents do? <\/p>\n<p>b) Addressing the Challenges \/ Finding Solutions <\/p>\n<p>\u2022Legal  certainty:  it  is  important  to  have  knowledge<br \/>\nabout domestic laws. A concept similar to \u201cregulatory<br \/>\nby design\u201d should be implemented.<br \/>\n\u2022 Regulatory  prohibition:  Depending  on  the  use  of<br \/>\nrobots we should ban the producing of robots to avoid<br \/>\nunfortunate  scenarios.  The  majority  agreed  that<br \/>\nmilitary robots should be banned.<br \/>\n\u2022 Data  prohibition:  Connected  with  the  regulatory<br \/>\nprohibition, the processing of the data out of the main<br \/>\npurpose  of  the  robot  should  be  prohibited.  This<br \/>\nincludes  a  revision  of  the  general  statements  that<br \/>\ncompanies normally do in order to collect as much data<br \/>\nas possible.<br \/>\n\u2022Public participation: the creation of a random jury as<br \/>\nwe  have  in  the  legal  system  could  help  on  the<br \/>\nparticipation  of  the  general  public  on  the  decision-<br \/>\nmaking process, as well as on the design of the robot<br \/>\ntechnology. Some information and materials could be<br \/>\ngiven  to  the  citizens  and  they  could  provide  their<br \/>\nfeedback.<br \/>\n\u2022Employment  of  technology:  increasing  the  salary  of<br \/>\nthe workers could make the caregiver profession more<br \/>\nattractive and increase efficiency as other companies<br \/>\nhave  experienced.  Working  less  hours  can  also<br \/>\nincrease efficiency although it is not clear how it could<br \/>\nbe modeled with care professions.<br \/>\n\u2022Unexpected  consequences:  If  we  could  predict  and<br \/>\nmodel  an  agent\u2019s  behavior  then  we  could  avoid<br \/>\nunexpected  consequences.  Building  robot  strategies<br \/>\nwithin the robot itself could also be of help.<br \/>\n\u2022Education:  it  seems  very  difficult  to  know  how  to<br \/>\nteach creativity in Japan where the system is based on<br \/>\nmemorization.  Helping  at  this  could  help  the<br \/>\nacceptance  of  robotic  technology  as  well  as  could<br \/>\npromote the active participation on the design process<br \/>\nof the robots.<br \/>\n\u2022Transparency:  The  robot  should  be  able  to  show  or<br \/>\nexplain  how  is  using  the  personal  data  to  promote<br \/>\ntransparency  and  user  awareness.  The  use  of  black<br \/>\nboxes  could  provide  more  information  on  the  robot<br \/>\nusage. It is not clear, however, until what extent the<br \/>\ngovernment should have access to it.<br \/>\n\u2022Regulated-by-Design:  This  hybrid  regulatory  model<br \/>\nshould  be  embedded  into  the  system  to  avoid  any<br \/>\nviolations with domestic and international laws.<br \/>\n\u2022Pro-activity: The system of Tokku in Japan should be<br \/>\nspread  all  over  the  world  in  order  to  have  Testing<br \/>\nZones for regulatory purposes.<br \/>\n\u2022Regulatory model: we need a hybrid model that can<br \/>\ncope  with  robotic  technologies  as  well  as  with  other<br \/>\ntechnologies,  as  the  delivery  of  legal  counseling  is<br \/>\nchanging rapidly: from having divorce apps to chatbots<br \/>\nthat deal with parking tickets.<br \/>\n\u2022Regulatory model: connected to this idea, each project<br \/>\nthat involve robotic technology could be designed in a<br \/>\nway that knowledge can be extracted from it for policy<br \/>\npurposes.<br \/>\n\u2022Case-by-case: the regulatory model should be done in<br \/>\na way that can cope with the particular needs of every<br \/>\nrobot and every context where this is inserted, as not<br \/>\nall the robots possess the same degree of intelligence<br \/>\nor the same capabilities.<br \/>\n\u2022Robotic Agency: the creation of an agency that deals<br \/>\nwith  robots  as  it  occurs  in  Japan  could  help  having<br \/>\nbetter management of all the ELS issues.<br \/>\n\u2022Open international discussions: there is the need to<br \/>\nopen the debate to more people and to more countries.<br \/>\n\u2022 Replacing  humans:  robots  should  be  conceived  as<br \/>\nhelpers of the humans not a replacement of them.<br \/>\n\u2022Clarity on the capabilities classification could bring<br \/>\nabout  intelligibility  on  what  is\/should  be  permitted<br \/>\nand what should not.<br \/>\n\u2022This clarity relates also to the vision and expectations<br \/>\nof  the  different  countries  on  robotic  technology,  e.g.<br \/>\ninternational future robotic trends.<br \/>\n\u2022 Decision-making  of  the  robot:  in  the  case  of  an<br \/>\naccident,  everyone  could  be  assigned  different values\/importance in order the robot to choose the best<br \/>\ntarget.  This  could  raise  discrimination  issues  at  the<br \/>\nsame time.<br \/>\n\u2022Harmonization: There is the need to harmonize what<br \/>\nimpact  means,  what  is  risk,  and  what  are  the  legal<br \/>\nissues concerning this type of robotic technology. There<br \/>\nis also the need to have a common understanding.<br \/>\n\u2022Alternative  solutions:  if  the  technology  allows,  the<br \/>\nrobot  should  be  privacy  friendly  using  other<br \/>\ntechnologies, e.g. removing the cameras in the case of<br \/>\ndrones; or using vibrations of the floor to know that the<br \/>\npatient has fallen.<br \/>\n\u2022Privacy: a system similar to the noise that cameras in<br \/>\nKorea make when they take a picture could be adopted<br \/>\nin  order  to  spread  awareness  among  the  users.  The<br \/>\nproblem with this solution is that there are available<br \/>\napps that allow users to take a picture without making<br \/>\nnoise.<br \/>\n\u2022Ethics  could  be  addressed  by  common  sense  rules,<br \/>\nalthough common sense varies between countries and<br \/>\nindividuals.<br \/>\n\u2022The creation of a data bank for scientific innovations<br \/>\ncould help avoiding the non authorized uses of data.<br \/>\n\u2022  An international expert committee could be<br \/>\ncreated to draft group reports <\/p>\n<p>c) Main Issues (Recurring Topics)   <\/p>\n<p>\u2022Regulatory model: There are no clear rules on the use<br \/>\nof robotic technology in therapy and education. Law is<br \/>\nnot pragmatic.<br \/>\n\u2022All the parties want to avoid responsibility of harm<br \/>\noccurrence<br \/>\n\u2022Growing need of the importance of ELS issues when<br \/>\nthe human-robot interaction involves vulnerable parts<br \/>\nof the society.<br \/>\n\u2022 Solutions:  each  solution  can  bring  about  negative<br \/>\nconsequences.  Therefore,  an  analysis  of  all  the  pros<br \/>\nand cons will have to be made in order to mitigate any<br \/>\nrisk posed by the solutions<br \/>\n\u2022The  future  of  work  (involving  the  promotions  of  co-<br \/>\nworking spaces)<br \/>\n\u2022Third uses of data (involving privacy post mortem)<br \/>\n\u2022The need for an international set of rules and basic<br \/>\nprinciples.<br \/>\n\u2022Robots  will  change  the  way  how  we  conceive  this<br \/>\nworld.<\/p>\n<p>d) Future Steps <\/p>\n<p>\u2022The legal system needs to<br \/>\n  be disrupted<br \/>\n  be pro-active<br \/>\n  be dynamic<br \/>\n  be more accessible<br \/>\n\u2022There  is  the  need  to  run  more  ELS  workshops  in<br \/>\ndifferent countries with different target participants:<br \/>\nindustry, laymen, legal scholars, etc.<br \/>\n\u2022A great effort has to be done in order to change how<br \/>\npeople learn as everything is converging in this world.<br \/>\nThe term people in this case involves any person from<br \/>\nany age.<br \/>\n\u2022There is the need to share the knowledge on robotic<br \/>\ntechnology among legal scholars.<br \/>\n\u2022 A  clear  classification  on  the  capabilities  of  robots<br \/>\n(educational, therapeutic) could be of help.<br \/>\n\u2022There is the need to speak with main organizations,<br \/>\ne.g. WTO, about this topic.<br \/>\n\u2022We do need an international legal framework that can<br \/>\ncope  with  all  these  ELS  issues  in  the  use  of  robotic<br \/>\ntechnology,  especially  if  they  work  with  vulnerable<br \/>\nparts of the society.<br \/>\n\u2022 There  should  be  placed  the  idea  that  robotic<br \/>\ntechnology are a supplement of the human\u2019s work <\/p>\n<p>Ethical, Legal, and Social Aspects of Social Robots in<br \/>\nTherapy  and  Education  Workshop  Report  Workshop<br \/>\norganized  by:  Eduard  Fosch,  Christoph  Lutz  and<br \/>\nAurelia Tam\u00f2 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;!&#8211; Accepted workshops will be available in April 2016. Accepted workshops in 2014 is available (Accepted workshops in 2014). &#8211;&gt; List of workshops Tenth International Workshop on Juris-informatics (JURISIN 2016) The 2nd international workshop Healthy Aging Tech Mashup service, data and people (HAT-MASH 2016) Skill Sciences Scientific Document Analysis (SCIDOCA 2016) Logic and Engineering of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"parent":339,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-templates\/full-width.php","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/343"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=343"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/343\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=343"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}